|
Intershame On: Patient-Centered Health Care Movement |
Orwellian Doublespeak at its Finest
08/05/2009
This is the best you got?
The "Patient-Centered Health Care Movement" sounds great, doesn't it? It's a movement, which is nice. It involves health care and health care is important, so that's nice too. And it's patient-centered. I'm a patient. Anything "patient-centered" must be something I'm in control of or by default an advocate for.In actuality, the "Patient-Centered Health Care Movement" is a Republican coined term used to frame the health care debate in their favor. You see, if their idea for reform is "patient-centered", then the oppositions can be framed as "government-centered" - and we all know the government is merely a collection of incompetent boobs incapable of doing anything right.
Republican's really need to get a new playbook. For as long as I've been alive, the GOP's primary argument has been that all of societies ills can be traced to government incompetence. Which I've always found ironic considering they're complaining about a system they're a part of. It's like hating baseball, but joining the team. The GOP's argument is quite literally the equivalent of going into work and telling your boss you think the company would be better run if there was no company.
Naturally, the argument the Republican party is making about health care reform is that the health care industry can be fixed by doing nothing. Well, not exactly doing nothing. They want to control costs by allowing the insurance industry to run free.
You really need to read ridiculous talking points memo. It's first four pages are an Orwellian doublespeak how-to guide instructing their members what to say in order to appeal to their constituents without ever explaining what their policies are. They concede the policy debate right on page one: "We cannot compete with their cause v. our policies. We must compete with their cause v. our cause". Not only is the GOP aware their own policies can't win in a debate, they openly admit it.
In the remainder of the memo, the GOP is instructed to offer the following solutions to the health care crisis:
1) Force doctors to post the prices of their services.
2) Make insurance companies have one-page contracts.
3) Protect doctors from malpractice lawsuits.
4) Cut out the "Washington Middle Man"
5) Tax cuts for updating IT systems
6) Emulate Wal-Mart
7) Individual tax deductions to help pay for premiums.
8) No lifetime health care benefits for congressmen.
9) Eliminate pre-existing condition descrimination.
Really? That's not reform, that's a complete joke. #9 is the only measure that actually might benefit the average citizen. The other GOP suggestions for reform are either handouts to the insurance industry (tax benefits that go straight to in insurance industry's pockets) or protection for or deregulation of health care industry players. Again, the free market (and subsidies) will save everything.
Let's really apply the free market approach to health care. If you need to see a doctor, you go to the hospital and pay them directly for whatever service they provide. If the GOP were to stick to their ideals, that should be their solution. No more insurance companies. No more insurance brokers. No more insurance. Just the consumer paying the person performing the service - capitalism at it finest. Quite honestly, I'd feel better in that system knowing that my dollar was going to pay for actual heath care instead of being divided up 20 different ways before it actually gets to the person who told me to cough.
If the GOP used that stragegy instead of the vapid, hollow and meaningless notion of a "Patient-Centered Health Care Movement" at least I'd respect them for truly sticking to their core beliefs. Instead the Republican party is forced to fabricate a "Patient-Centered Health Care Movement" in order to conceal that they have nothing to offer at all.
Comments
- 916 days agoYou are correct. Everyone should have noticed that the eleven page economic package offered earlier this year was just the first in a number of obstructionist ploys by the Grand Old Party, it did not even contain any numbers, but yet was supposed to stimulate the economy. This is just wrong. We, as a group, elect these idiots. Yet we don't hold them accountable. When was the last time your duly elected official in D.C. actually did something for the constituents and not the corporations? Personally, I don't agree with either of the political parties. We, here in this country, have enough to feed, clothe and house every single person on the planet. No, I'm not a liberal, but I am a reasonable person. It's time we take back our humanity. From the starving people in Americas deep south to the starving people everywhere. I agree with you, it's time to say that enough is enough. Sorry, I'll climb down off my soap box now.
- 916 days agoObviously you have never had a pre-mature baby, or been in ICU for a month. If you would like to just go ahead and pay directly for those costs be my guest. You are looking at catastrophic liability. For a 26 week gestation neonate that has respiratory problems among others you would be lucky to walk away with a million dollar hospital bill. This is why insurance companies were started to begin. Very few of us can foot that kind of bill. I guess your next idea will be like some of the others out there and we should just euthanize the weaker.
- 914 days agoI think there was quite a bit of sarcasm involved in the second-to-last paragraph lol. I doubt the author really advocates a fee-for-service approach. To me, it was more a comparison of what a true free-market approach to healthcare would be with what the Republicans are selling. Their product seems more like dog shit in a pretty bag with a bow on it being lit on fire on your doorstep. It's repackaged nicely, but still on fire and smelling like dog shit.
Add a Comment
