After what Steve Doocy said, I have doubt about his ability to read.
Today we tap one of our favorite sources for idiocy, Fox News' morning zoo "Fox and Friends".

The Fox News family is all up in arms over the Obama White House categorizing their network, not as news, but as exactly what they are - a right-wing talking point regurgitation machine with an agenda. Naturally, Fox News is responding exactly how you'd expect an entity to respond after they've had the unattractive truth of their reality thrown into their face - by pleading ignorance and feigning shock.

It's not easy to combat a truth as obvious as Fox News' bias, but the network is certainly giving it the old college try. As part Fox News' self-defense, Fox and Friends anchors Brian Kilmeade and Steve Doocy interviewed former Bush White House press secretary Dana Perino so she could juxtapose the Bush White House's willingness to deal with unfriendly media next to the the Obama "unjust" stance towards Fox News.

While this notion is laughable, what Steve Doocy says during the interview is not. Referring to the White House's criticism of Fox News, Doocy states (video follows):
And you know it's funny Dana, I didn't do a thorough search, but I did do a little Google thing. The New York Times came out against it, The Nation refers to, says there's a word for what the President and his aids are doing and that's "whining" and refers to the President as the "Whiner-in-Chief", the Baltimore Sun thinks it's stupid, and the Newsweek column said that it is essentually un-American.

Newsweek called Obama un-American? Not only is that complete bullshit, it's backwards. The Newsweek article Doocy cites says that Rupert Murdoch is un-American for bringing the Australian-British-continental model of politicized media to the United States via Fox News. That's right, Newsweek is calling the very existence of Fox News un-American, not the White House for criticizing it.

The article is even called "The O’Garbage Factor. Fox News isn't just bad. It's un-American." How can you possibly fuck up the meaning of that article? I guess when Doocy told Perino "I didn't do a thorough search", he wasn't kidding.

The Newsweek article in question can be found here, and below is the relevant excerpt:
What's most distinctive about the American press is not its freedom but its century-old tradition of independence—that it serves the public interest rather than those of parties, persuasions, or pressure groups. Media independence is a 20th-century innovation that has never fully taken root in many other countries that do have a free press. The Australian-British-continental model of politicized media that Murdoch has applied at Fox is un-American, so much so that he has little choice but go on denying what he's doing as he does it. For Murdoch, Ailes, and company, "fair and balanced" is a necessary lie. To admit that their coverage is slanted by design would violate the American understanding of the media's role in democracy and our idea of what constitutes fair play. But it's a demonstrable deceit that no longer deserves equal time.
I have some advice for Fox News - if you want your television station to be a credible news organization, maybe you should tell your anchors to stop making shit up.